Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
MiniMax
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 3.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 5.1). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.15$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.0825$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.015
Context window131K1M
Max output118K524K
Intelligence index5.129.1
Coding index22.4—
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Granite 4.2 8B is 3.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $195.00, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons