Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
NVIDIA
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 2.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.6 vs 5.1). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.15$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.0825$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.02
Context window131K1M
Max output118K944K
Intelligence index5.113.6
Coding index22.4—
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Granite 4.2 8B is 2.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $195.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons