Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 16% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 11.1). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.25$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.012
Context window131K262K
Max output118K33K
Intelligence index11.124.6
Coding index22.457
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 16% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons