Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 22.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 11.1). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 131K).
| Granite 4.2 8B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.06 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.25 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.11 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 131K | 500K |
| Max output | 118K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 11.1 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 22.4 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Grok 4.7?
Granite 4.2 8B is 22.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Granite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Command A+Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 LunaGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 SolGranite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGranite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGranite 4.2 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 AstraGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5