Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 39% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.06 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.25 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.11 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 118K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 11.1 | — |
| Coding index | 22.4 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Granite 4.2 8B is 39% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Granite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Command A+Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 LunaGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 SolGranite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGranite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.7Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGranite 4.2 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 AstraGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5