GLM 5.3 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 16.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 8K).
| GLM 5.3 | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.84 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.64 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.29 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | — |
| Context window | 1.3M | 8K |
| Max output | 131K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 44.8 | — |
| Coding index | 74.8 | — |
| Providers | 34 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 16.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5