GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.84 / $2.64
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
X
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.84$0.14
Output price / 1M$2.64$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$1.29$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.16$0.0028
Context window1.3M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index44.8—
Coding index74.8—
Providers342
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%98.2%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-182026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5