GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.84 / $2.64
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.84$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.64$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$1.29$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.16$0.016
Context window1.3M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index44.8—
Coding index74.8—
Providers341
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-182026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5