Command A+ vs GLM 5.3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.84 / $2.64
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
Z
Verdict: Command A+ is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 192K).
Command A+GLM 5.3
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.84
Output price / 1M$1.50$2.64
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$1.29
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.16
Context window192K1.3M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index—44.8
Coding index—74.8
Providers134
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-08-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GLM 5.3?

Command A+ is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons

Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed