GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 is 15.5× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (52.7 vs 44.8). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1.1M).
| GLM 5.3 | GPT-6 Astra | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.84 | $10.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.64 | $50.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.29 | $20.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 44.8 | 52.7 |
| Coding index | 74.8 | 76.9 |
| Providers | 34 | 6 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-09-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or GPT-6 Astra?
GLM 5.3 is 15.5× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. GPT-6 Astra: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, GPT-6 Astra ≈ $45,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Astra vs Command A+GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5.5