GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 26.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 13.4). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.0784$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$1.30
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M131K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index27.813.4
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262025-09-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 26.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons