GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.0784$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output131K115K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons