GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Wonder
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 573.5× cheaper than Muse Wonder on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Muse Wonder | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.013 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0168 | $20.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.014 | $8.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0119 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 40 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-10-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Muse Wonder?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 573.5× cheaper than Muse Wonder on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Wonder: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Wonder: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $34.40, Muse Wonder ≈ $18,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Wonder vs Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Wonder vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMuse Wonder vs Gemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder vs Claude Haiku 5.5