Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 33.7× cheaper than Muse Wonder on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $20.00 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $8.00 | $0.24 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | — | 13.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 9 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-12 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 33.7× cheaper than Muse Wonder on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?
Muse Wonder: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Wonder ≈ $18,000, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.
More comparisons
Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Wonder vs Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Wonder vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Wonder vs Gemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder vs Claude Haiku 5.5Muse Wonder vs Nano Banana 2.1Muse Wonder vs Mistral Large 4Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMuse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 SolMuse Wonder vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Muse Wonder vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMuse Wonder vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMuse Wonder vs Command A+Muse Wonder vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 TerraNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Kimi K3.1 ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Nano Banana 2.1