GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
K

Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Kt
$0.20 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
K
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashMi:dm K 3.0 Pro
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262026-11-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: 261,795 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons