Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
K

Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro

Kt
$0.20 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
K
Verdict: Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro is 45.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072026-11-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro?

Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro is 45.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: 261,795 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons