Hy4 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro is 44% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.35 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.04 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro?
Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro is 44% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro: 261,795 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro ≈ $800.00.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Mi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMi:dm K 3.0 Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro