GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Ling 3.0 Tiny | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.015 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $0.045 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.0225 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.003 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 250K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 26.5 |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-08-06 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Tiny?
Ling 3.0 Tiny is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro