GPT-6.1 Terra vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 88.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.0 Tiny | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.015 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.045 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.0225 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.003 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 250K |
| Intelligence index | 51.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | 26.5 |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-08-06 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Ling 3.0 Tiny?
Ling 3.0 Tiny is 88.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs Kimi K3.1 Pro