Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 150.0× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Tiny has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.015
Output price / 1M$9.00$0.045
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.0225
Cached input / 1M—$0.003
Context window131K262K
Max output66K250K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—26.5
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-052026-08-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash or Ling 3.0 Tiny?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 150.0× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash ≈ $7,500, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.

More comparisons