Gemma 3 27B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemma 3 27B

Google
$0.08 / $0.45
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 48% cheaper than Gemma 3 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 4.9). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemma 3 27BLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.45$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.17$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.012
Context window131K262K
Max output118K33K
Intelligence index4.924.6
Coding index10.157
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-03-122026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 48% cheaper than Gemma 3 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 3 27B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 27B ≈ $385.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons