Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Gemma 3 27B

Google
$0.08 / $0.45
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
G
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 46.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 4.9). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 3 27B
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.08
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.45
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.17
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.04
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index57.64.9
Coding index10.1
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222025-03-12
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is 46.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Gemma 3 27B ≈ $385.00.

More comparisons