Gemma 3 27B vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 13.9× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 4.9). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 131K).
| Gemma 3 27B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.08 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.45 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.17 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.04 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 131K | 500K |
| Max output | 118K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 4.9 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 10.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Grok 4.7?
Gemma 3 27B is 13.9× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 3 27B vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 27B ≈ $385.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 3 27B vs Command A+Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 3 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5