Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 3.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Gemma 3 27B | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.08 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.45 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.17 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.04 | $0.09 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 118K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 4.9 | — |
| Coding index | 10.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
Gemma 3 27B is 3.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 27B ≈ $385.00, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 3 27B vs Command A+Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 3 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 3 27B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5