DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Prism Ml
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 36% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.004$0.0375
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers36—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-09-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 36% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons