Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
Command ANemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.20
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$4.38$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window256K131K
Max output8K118K
Intelligence index13.1
Coding index27.8
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-03-132026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Command A: 256,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons