Command A vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.05 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 50.0× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 vs 8.9). Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
Command ANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.05
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$4.38$0.0875
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window256K262K
Max output8K236K
Intelligence index13.18.9
Coding index27.814.4
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-03-132025-12-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 50.0× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Command A: 256,000 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $200.00.

More comparisons