Command A+ vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.05 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 6.9× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 192K).
Command A+Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.05
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.0875
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.03
Context window192K262K
Max output64K236K
Intelligence index8.9
Coding index14.4
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222025-12-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 6.9× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $200.00.

More comparisons