Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Gemini 4 Argon is 4.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 50.4). Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Gemini 4 Argon
Input price / 1M$8.00$2.00
Output price / 1M$40.00$10.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$4.00
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.10
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.650.4
Coding index——
Providers56
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-10-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is 4.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Argon: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000.

More comparisons