Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Seed-2.0-Code

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
B

Seed-2.0-Code

ByteDance Seed
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
B
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.6× cheaper than Seed-2.0-Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Seed-2.0-Code has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetySeed-2.0-Code
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.50
Output price / 1M$0.20$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.13
Cached input / 1M
Context window131K262K
Max output118K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042026-08-12
Retirement2026-11-11

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Seed-2.0-Code?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.6× cheaper than Seed-2.0-Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Seed-2.0-Code: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Seed-2.0-Code: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Seed-2.0-Code ≈ $2,500.

More comparisons