Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.03 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.03
Output price / 1M$0.20$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.055
Cached input / 1M$0.006
Context window131K1M
Max output118K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042026-07-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.

More comparisons