Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.8× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.20$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.75
Cached input / 1M
Context window131K262K
Max output118K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042025-10-06
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.8× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons