Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.03 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 9.5× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.03
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.055
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.006
Context window131K1M
Max output16K66K
Intelligence index6.3—
Coding index49—
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-092026-07-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is 9.5× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.

More comparisons