Hy4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B is 16% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (34.6 vs 6.3). Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Hy4 | Muse Glimmer 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.52 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.04 |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | 6.3 |
| Coding index | — | 49 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-08-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B is 16% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro