Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta
Verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B is 5.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Muse Glimmer 30B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.30
Output price / 1M$7.50$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.52
Cached input / 1M—$0.04
Context window66K131K
Max output59K16K
Intelligence index—6.3
Coding index—49
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-08-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is 5.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons