Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.3× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.6 vs 6.3). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Muse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.02
Context window131K1M
Max output16K944K
Intelligence index6.313.6
Coding index49—
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-092026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.3× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons