Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta
Verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B is 30.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 6.3). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Muse Glimmer 30B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.30
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.04
Context window1M131K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index64.66.3
Coding index—49
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is 30.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons