Saba vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 23% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
| Saba | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.20 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 26K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 13.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 10 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Saba or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 23% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Saba vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Saba ≈ $700.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Saba vs Gemini 4 CarbonSaba vs Claude Fable 5.2Saba vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashSaba vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSaba vs Hy4Saba vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalSaba vs GPT-6.1 TerraSaba vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProSaba vs Kimi K3.1 ProSaba vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashSaba vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Saba vs Gemini 4 ArgonSaba vs Claude Haiku 5.5Saba vs Nano Banana 2.1Saba vs Mistral Large 4Saba vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy4Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 TerraNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro