Gemini 4 Argon vs Saba

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Mistral AI

Saba

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Mistral AI
Verdict: Saba is 13.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Gemini 4 ArgonSaba
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.02
Context window1M33K
Max output944K26K
Intelligence index50.4—
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-132025-02-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Saba?

Saba is 13.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Saba ≈ $700.00.

More comparisons