MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Saba

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Mistral AI

Saba

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Mistral AI
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 13% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashSaba
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.02
Context window1M33K
Max output524K26K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-02-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Saba?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 13% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Saba ≈ $700.00.

More comparisons