Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Saba
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 33% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.01 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 1M | 33K |
| Max output | 128K | 26K |
| Intelligence index | 36.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 10 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2025-02-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Saba?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is 33% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Saba ≈ $700.00.
More comparisons
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Hy4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Nano Banana 2.1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProSaba vs Gemini 4 CarbonSaba vs Claude Fable 5.2Saba vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashSaba vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSaba vs Hy4Saba vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalSaba vs GPT-6.1 TerraSaba vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro