Nano Banana 2.1 vs Saba
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Saba is 10.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nano Banana 2.1 has the larger context window (66K vs 33K).
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.30 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.02 |
| Context window | 66K | 33K |
| Max output | 59K | 26K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2025-02-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Saba?
Saba is 10.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Saba ≈ $700.00.
More comparisons
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Hy4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProNano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProSaba vs Gemini 4 CarbonSaba vs Claude Fable 5.2Saba vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashSaba vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSaba vs Hy4Saba vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalSaba vs GPT-6.1 TerraSaba vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro