MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.88
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.9 vs 20.1). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.60$1.88
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.58
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.0375
Context window1M1M
Max output524K236K
Intelligence index28.920.1
Coding index—68.1
Providers1422
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-08-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $1,238.

More comparisons