Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 5.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $1.88 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.58 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0375 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 59K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | — | 20.1 |
| Coding index | — | 68.1 |
| Providers | 1 | 22 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 5.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $1,238.
More comparisons
Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProNano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNano Banana 2.1 vs Command A+Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3.8 27B vs Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5