Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.88
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (20.1 vs 13.6). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.88
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.58
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.0375
Context window1M1M
Max output236K236K
Intelligence index13.620.1
Coding index—68.1
Providers922
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-08-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3.8 27B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $1,238.

More comparisons