MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.29 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.29
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.0028—
Context window1.1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index26.7—
Coding index——
Providers8—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212025-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ≈ $1,080.

More comparisons