MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.20 / $0.97

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$0.97
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.39
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.039
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	131K	66K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	2	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	99.9%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2025-09-17
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Flash: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 Coder Flash ≈ $877.50.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Cost calculator

FAQ

More comparisons