Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $0.97
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 Coder Flash is 10.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 Coder Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.97
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.039
Context window1M1M
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102025-09-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash is 10.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 Coder Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 Coder Flash ≈ $877.50.

More comparisons