MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 17.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 26.7). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.25
Context window	1.1M	1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	26.7	33.7
Coding index	—	76.2
Providers	8	2
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-09-03
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 17.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons