MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 17.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.14$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.28$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers21
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 17.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons