MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
U
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.4× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashPareto
Input price / 1M$0.14$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.28$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.25
Context window1M262K
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Pareto?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.4× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Pareto ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5